If making a change with two properties, what must be true about those properties?

When considering changes involving two properties, the correct understanding is that both properties must be in a different chain and company. This condition arises from the fact that analyzing the impact of changes, such as operational procedures or strategic initiatives, typically requires a clear distinction in brand identity and management directives. Each chain operates under unique guidelines influenced by their parent companies, which can affect how changes are implemented and their resultant efficacy.

Being in different chains and companies allows for a comparative analysis, providing insights that are not biased by the same operational frameworks or corporate strategies. This separation ensures that findings and adjustments can be realistically applied and assessed, revealing how disparate business models handle similar challenges differently.

In contrast, if both properties were to be under the same chain or even the same management, the results might not yield meaningful comparisons since the inherent policies and practices would likely influence outcomes in similar ways, thus limiting insight into what might work across different contexts.